Mmegi

Khama, Serogola should find each other

The unfolding saga in Serowe, where former president Ian Khama seeks to reclaim his position as Kgosikgolo by removing Deputy Kgosi, Kgosi Serogola Seretse, highlights a significant power struggle within the Bagammangwato tribe. This situation is not just a clash of personalities but a test of the legal and traditional frameworks that govern Botswana’s chieftaincy.

Khama’s announcement to take over as Kgosikgolo was met with jubilation by some, but it also exposed deep-seated divisions. The Bogosi Act, which clearly states that a Mothusa Kgosi cannot be removed without the minister’s involvement, serves as a crucial legal safeguard. This law is designed to prevent arbitrary decisions and ensure stability within traditional leadership structures.

The tension between Khama and Serogola has been simmering for years, with royal uncles expressing frustration over Serogola’s refusal to convene meetings to address critical issues. This ongoing conflict has only deepened the divide within the Bagammangwato community, threatening the peace and unity of the Kgotla.

Khama’s legal battle to compel the Minister to appoint Seretse Peter Khama as regent has seen little progress, further adding to the uncertainty and frustration. The former president’s claim that Serogola has become “big-headed” and is dividing the community, underscores the deep-seated animosity between the two leaders.

However, it is essential to recognise that the Bogosi Act was designed to prevent precisely this kind of power struggle. By placing the authority to remove a Deputy Chief in the hands of the minister, the Act ensures that such decisions are made with careful consideration and not on a whim. This legal safeguard is crucial in maintaining stability and preventing the abuse of power within traditional leadership structures. Khama’s desire to take over as Kgosikgolo and serve the Bagammangwato is understandable, given his long-standing role and influence within the community. However, his approach must align with the legal framework that governs traditional leadership. Attempting to bypass these laws not only undermines the rule of law but also risks further polarising the community he seeks to lead.

The path forward for Khama and Serogola requires dialogue and compromise. Both leaders must prioritise the well-being of the Bagammangwato people over personal grievances. The community’s unity and peace depend on their ability to work together, despite their differences. The Bogosi Act’s provisions are clear, and any attempt to circumvent them would likely result in prolonged legal battles and further division within the Bagammangwato community. It is time for Khama and Serogola to find common ground and focus on serving their people with integrity and respect for the law.

“The most powerful force ever known on this planet is human cooperation - a force for construction and destruction”.

- Jonathan Haidt

Editor's Comment
Khama, gov't should cooperate

Firstly, the government must play its part in facilitating this transition. The role of Kgosi isn't merely ceremonial; it carries substantial responsibilities and influence within the community. Therefore, the government must ensure that all legal and procedural requirements are met to support Khama's return. This includes providing the necessary resources and administrative support to uphold the integrity of the Kgotla and its...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up